COVID Accountability Victory: Court Rules in Favor of Healthcare Whistleblower
From Attorney Warner Mendenhall, Esq, TFH legal advisor and lead attorney for the Truth For Health Foundation.
On June 11, 2025, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York issued a landmark ruling for my client, Deborah Conrad, in her case against Rochester Regional Health and United Memorial Medical Center. Judge Sinatra denied the hospital's motion to dismiss the core claims in Deborah's False Claims Act lawsuit, letting her case go to discovery. For 21 years, Deborah Conrad served as a dedicated Physician Assistant. She was fired from Rochester Regional Health for doing her job - reporting adverse events to protect public safety. A federal court has just vindicated her actions and opened the door for accountability. Here's what this means:
The Court Found:
Rochester Regional Health had a material obligation to report serious adverse events to VAERS under their Provider Agreement with the CDC.
The hospital's failure to report while continuing to seek federal reimbursement was potential fraud against the government.
Deborah's detailed allegations were enough to meet the strict legal standards for fraud claims, even without access to internal billing records.
Her retaliation claim can move forward - the court found she was probably fired for trying to expose the hospital's failure to report adverse events.
This decision establishes critical legal precedents:
VAERS Reporting is Not Optional: The court confirmed that adverse event reporting requirements are "material conditions of payment" - not just bureaucratic paperwork.
Hospitals Can Be Held Accountable: Healthcare providers who take federal money while failing to meet safety reporting obligations can face False Claims Act liability.
Whistleblowers Are Protected: The court recognized that employees who try to ensure proper adverse event reporting are engaging in protected activity.
Deborah's case involved 170 serious adverse events that the hospital allegedly prevented her from reporting. 160 VAERS reports she successfully submitted on her own initiative. Specific patient examples of adverse events following vaccination that went unreported. The court found these allegations painted a picture of systematic non-compliance with federal safety monitoring requirements.
This ruling is significant beyond just Deborah's case. It establishes that
1) healthcare providers cannot ignore federal safety reporting requirements while continuing to collect taxpayer money;
2) the False Claims Act can be used to hold institutions accountable for COVID-related misconduct; and
3) whistleblowers who expose these practices have legal protection.
We estimate over 500,000 were killed by the shots, millions lost their jobs for refusing them, and Big Pharma received billions for dangerous and experimental treatments. This case reveals a legal pathway to begin holding the system accountable.
Ms. Conrad’s case now moves to discovery, where the Mendenhall legal team will seek the hospital's internal “vaccination,” treatment, and billing records to uncover the full scope of unreported adverse events which are believed to be in the 1000s in this hospital system alone.
You can read more details here:
First Amended Complaint
District Court Opinion
Covid Vaccination Program Provider Agreement: the basis for liability for all C19 shot providers.
Support Truth for Health Foundation in these critical legal battles and donate to our Medical Freedom & Legal Defense Fund. Our legal defense grants to attorneys such as Warner Mendenhall have been awarded to assist in the costs of these critically important cases. We still need your financial gifts to continue our legal defense grants program. Help us help Americans seeking justice through the court system. With victories like this one proving that accountability is achievable, your contribution can help make sure more cases can be pursued.
In His Service,
Elizabeth Lee Vliet, M.D.
President and CEO




